The different flaw with the movie, frankly, is Sophie herself, who’s introduced in such an off-putting method that the majority viewers will discover it troublesome to root for her or her survival. I get that the movie needs to push again towards the usual trope of the candy, helpless, and plucky blind younger girl that we within the viewers are clearly meant to really feel protecting in direction of all through. Much just like the premise, that’s fascinating up to some extent. However, the screenplay goes method too arduous within the different course, as Sophie’s ethical ambiguity too typically curdles to the purpose the place sympathizing her turns into almost not possible, particularly when her self-serving habits later finally ends up having deadly penalties for an additional character.
This, I ought to stress, isn’t the fault of Davenport, who’s legally blind in actual life and can be simply one of the best and most fascinating piece to “See for Me.” Davenport delivers a efficiency that’s typically stronger, smarter, and extra compelling than the fabric frankly deserves. Although their work is finally not sufficient to make “See for Me” something greater than a gimmick film that by no means fairly pays off, Davenport nearly makes it price watching and can depart you questioning about what they might accomplish with stronger materials.
Now enjoying in theaters and accessible on digital platforms.
Source link
#film #evaluation #movie #abstract
